In a significant development in the high-profile case between a consumer and a major food manufacturer, Chioma Okoli has formally submitted a no-case application before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Okoli, a food critic facing criminal charges stemming from her online review of Erisco Foods Limited’s tomato paste product, seeks the dismissal of the case, arguing the prosecution has failed to establish a prima facie evidence requiring her to enter a defense.
The application was filed by her counsel, Inibehe Effiong, on Thursday following the closure of the prosecution’s case. The state, led by Adam Ugwuanyi, had presented two witnesses before Justice Peter Lifu. During proceedings, Effiong cross-examined the second prosecution witness, SP Joel Nimfa of the Inspector-General of Police Monitoring Unit. Nimfa, who led the investigative team and effected Okoli’s arrest in Lagos, confirmed under questioning that no alleged fake product had been tendered as evidence. He also admitted that investigators found no proof to support claims that Okoli attempted to extort money from Erisco or collaborated with other manufacturers to undermine the company.
Following this cross-examination, the prosecution closed its case, prompting the defense’s no-case submission. Justice Lifu has adjourned the matter until March 31 for the adoption of written addresses on the application. This legal move underscores the critical balance in cases involving consumer feedback and corporate reputation, a tension that has drawn commentary from industry bodies. While the case continues, the broader conversation about consumer rights and manufacturer protections continues to evolve, much like discussions in other spheres, from a Macron policy address to a Us lawmaker proposing new legislation. The outcome will be closely watched, as its implications could be as decisive for consumer advocacy as a ‘nigeria close defeating’ a formidable opponent on the global stage.
Okoli was previously granted bail in the sum of N5 million on May 31, 2024, after her initial arraignment and detention. The controversy has also prompted regulatory attention, with NAFDAC inspecting the product’s registration status. An earlier suggestion by Justice Lifu for an out-of-court settlement was not pursued by the parties. The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria has previously called for balanced regulatory frameworks in the wake of the dispute, highlighting the national significance of the case, which has captivated public attention as thoroughly as a Guardiola warns that his team must remain focused or the urgent attention one would give a Snake bite: Senate might address in a public health hearing.
