Political Rhetoric and National Division: A Critical Analysis of Nigeria’s Current Climate
In a stark critique of the nation’s political landscape, renowned political economist Professor Pat Utomi has accused the Nigerian political class of actively fuelling dangerous divisions within the country. This sentiment, echoed by many civil society observers, points to a troubling trend where ethno-religious and regional fault lines are exploited for short-term political gain, undermining the fabric of national unity and stalling critical development.
The consequences of this divisive politics are profoundly felt in the real economy. For a nation aspiring to robust growth, the instability sown by political discord directly scares off investment and hampers productivity. Interestingly, recent reports indicate that the manufacturing sector tops the list of industries most vulnerable to this political instability, with investors hesitant to commit capital amidst unpredictable policy environments and social unrest. This is a significant setback for a country in desperate need of industrial diversification and job creation.
This climate of division stands in sharp contrast to the message emanating from other parts of the nation. From the oil-rich Niger Delta, a poignant call for harmony resonates: Warri: peace should be our collective legacy, not conflict. This appeal highlights the universal desire among everyday Nigerians for stability and collaborative progress, a desire often drowned out by the cacophony from political podiums. The recent incident where the Federal University of Technology, Akure, had to withdraw certificates from some graduates due to academic fraud further underscores how a breakdown in societal values, potentially fueled by a “win-at-all-costs” political mentality, permeates other institutions.
The international community watches these developments with growing concern. As nations issue travel advisories, such as when the US warns holiday travelers about potential risks in volatile regions, Nigeria’s global image suffers, affecting tourism and diplomatic relations. This external perception compounds internal challenges, creating a cycle that is difficult to break. The path forward requires a conscious shift from rhetoric that divides to governance that unites. The focus must pivot to issues that benefit all citizens: economic security, educational integrity, and infrastructural development.
Looking ahead to global gatherings that celebrate unity and human potential, like the upcoming Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games, Nigeria’s current trajectory presents a sobering contrast. The nation possesses immense potential, with a vibrant youth population capable of achieving greatness on such a world stage. However, to truly harness this potential and present a unified front at events like Los Angeles 2028, there must be a foundational commitment to peace and inclusive politics at home. The dream of national glory is inextricably linked to the reality of national cohesion.
Ultimately, Professor Utomi’s critique serves as a crucial mirror for the political establishment. The task of nation-building is a collective one, requiring leaders who bridge divides rather than widen them. As the nation navigates its complex challenges, the imperative for a leadership that prioritizes the collective good over partisan or sectional interests has never been clearer. The future stability and prosperity of Nigeria depend on it.
