It’s the story of how a journalist – the Atlantic magazine’s Jeffrey Goldberg – was added to a Signal platform messaging group which apparently included Vice-President JD Vance and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, in addition to National Security Adviser Mike Waltz.
The topic being discussed was attacking the Iran-backed Houthi group in Yemen.
Goldberg said he had seen classified military plans for the strikes, including weapons packages, targets and timing, two hours before the bombs struck.
What are the main revelations in a nutshell?
Vance questions Trump’s thinking
On the military action, Goldberg reported that the account named JD Vance wrote: “I think we are making a mistake.”
The vice-president said targeting Houthi forces that are attacking vessels in the Suez Canal serves European interests more than the US, because Europe has more trade running through the canal.
Vance added that his boss was perhaps unaware of how US action could help Europe.
“I am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now,” Vance said. “There’s a further risk that we see moderate to severe spike in oil prices.”
The vice-president went on to say, according to Goldberg, he would support the consensus but would prefer to delay it by a month.
Goldberg reported in his article that spokesman for JD Vance had later sent him a statement underlining that Trump and Vance had had “subsequent conversations about this matter and are in complete agreement”.
Since coming to power, Trump has castigated his European Nato allies, urged them to increase defence spending and generally insisted that Europe needs to take responsibility for protecting its own interests.
Blame for ‘free-loading’ Europe
Arguments over why the US could – and should – carry out the military strike against the Houthis did not sway Vance.
He said to the defence secretary, “If you think we should do it let’s go. I just hate bailing Europe out again.”
Hegseth reciprocated:
“I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. It’s PATHETIC.”
A group member, only identified as “SM” suggested that after the strike, the US should “make clear to Egypt and Europe what we expect in return”.
“If Europe doesn’t remunerate, then what?” he asked.
“If the US successfully restores freedom of navigation at great cost there needs to be some further economic gain extracted in return,” the user continues
